Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Part-3: Optimising DynamoDB Single-Table Model for Large-Scale Analytics Data

Updated
2 min read

We would like to evolve supporting from our current volume growth to support 5x data volume with increase in number of user triggered jobs. As a first step, to address the scalability, performance, and cost challenges of our initial DynamoDB implementation, we introduced optimizations at both the application and architecture layers.

Code-Level Optimizations

Event Aggregation

Our initial design stored each generated event as an individual DynamoDB item. While straightforward, this approach resulted in millions of write operations for a single analytics job, driving up both network overhead and DynamoDB write costs.

To optimize this, we leveraged DynamoDB's maximum item size of 400 KB by aggregating multiple related events into a single item before persisting them. This significantly reduced the number of write operations, network round trips, and Write Capacity Unit (WCU) consumption.

An additional benefit was improved read efficiency. Since related events were co-located within the same item, downstream applications could retrieve larger logical datasets with fewer database requests.

Data Compression

We further optimized storage by compressing event payloads before persisting them to DynamoDB.

Although decompression introduces a small overhead during reads, the benefits far outweighed the cost. Compression reduced storage consumption, lowered write throughput requirements, and decreased overall DynamoDB operating costs. In addition, the smaller payload sizes reduced network transfer volumes, resulting in an observed performance improvement of approximately 15%.

Scaling a Predictive Analytics Application on AWS - A Case Study

Part 3 of 6

Over the last few years, our Predictive Analytics application experienced significant growth in both data volume and workload complexity. What started as a traditional analytics solution running on an on-premises relational database eventually reached its scalability limits as business demand increased. To meet these challenges, we re-architected the application using Amazon DynamoDB and Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, transforming it into a highly scalable, event-driven system capable of processing over 500 jobs per day, including 30% more complex workloads, while maintaining a maximum data availability time of less than five minutes. This series documents the architectural journey, key design decisions, trade-offs, operational challenges, and lessons learned along the way. What You'll Learn How to identify when a relational database is no longer the right fit. When DynamoDB is a better choice than a traditional RDBMS. Designing single-table data models for large-scale immutable datasets. Handling burst traffic using Kinesis Data Streams. Cost optimization techniques for DynamoDB. Failure modes, capacity planning, and operational considerations. Measuring scalability through business outcomes rather than technical benchmarks.

Up next

Part 4: Solving Burst Traffic with Kinesis Data Streams

Introducing Kinesis Data Streams as a Buffer Layer While the code-level optimizations reduced the volume of data written to DynamoDB, they did not fully address the challenge of sudden traffic spike